Demonstrators furious that Hosni Mubarak's last prime minister made it into the run-off for the country's presidential election set ablaze his campaign headquarters on Monday, underscoring the divisive outcome of the nation's historic vote.
The campaign offices of Ahmed Shafiq, viewed as a symbol of Mubarak's rule, were set on fire after a group of protesters broke into and vandalized the premises, the state news agency reported. An official in the fire service confirmed the blaze had been extinguished without causing any casualties.
Several thousand protesters took to the streets across Egypt to demonstrate against the first-round result - a run-off between Shafiq and the Muslim Brotherhood's Mohamed Mursi, two of the most controversial figures in the field.
Troubled flared in Cairo's Tahrir Square when activists said unknown assailants attacked one such protest. Rocks were thrown in scenes reminiscent of other spasms of violence in a messy transition from military rule that is due to end with the election of the president.
The April 6 movement, one of the group's that spearheaded the 2011 revolt against Mubarak, said on its Facebook page that the Tahrir protest had been attacked by unknown "thugs".
Analysts had predicted that a Shafiq-Mursi run-off could trigger trouble, leading to a ballot box struggle between a symbol of the military-based autocracy of the last six decades and one of the Islamist movements it had oppressed.
Can Egypt's voters force candidates to compromise?
The result is deeply disappointing to the activist movement that took to the streets on January 25, 2011, inciting the protests that toppled Mubarak. They had seen other candidates as more representative of their hopes for change.
One of those candidates, Khaled Ali, joined a protest in Tahrir Square, where the numbers grew into the night.
"Revolutionaries! Free! We will complete the march!" chanted some 2,000 demonstrators as they made their way through the centre of Cairo, a short distance from Tahrir Square, the cradle of the uprising that toppled Mubarak.
Though both Mursi and Shafiq have sizeable constituencies, the result has left the many Egyptians who voted for neither with a wrenching choice between a symbol of the past autocracy and an Islamist group that arouses deep suspicions for some.
-
Only on msnbc.com
- 16-year-old sets off buzz over 325-year-old physics
- Can Egypt's voters force candidates to compromise?
- Weather chief quits after misappropriation probe
- Barbecues 'bottom of the list' for moms of fallen troops
- 'Noah's Ark' built to save frogs in peril
Mursi topped the poll with 24.3 percent of the vote, followed by Shafiq with 23.3 percent. Turnout was 46 percent, according to official results released on Monday.
About half of the first-round votes went to candidates somewhere in the middle ground - from leftist Hamdeen Sabahy, third-placed with 20.4 percent, to moderate Islamist Abdel Moneim Abol Fotouh, with 17.2 percent, and former Arab League secretary-general Amr Moussa, with 10.9 percent.
"Neither Brotherhood or feloul," said Mahmoud Momen, a 19-year old student, invoking the word used in Egyptian political slang to refer to politicians who served in the Mubarak administration. He had voted for Abol Fotouh.
"We want someone who represents the square," added Momen, holding aloft a picture of Shafiq with black X daubed over his face as he took part in the Cairo march.
Another protester, a 19-year old student who identified himself as Omar, said the vote had been rigged, triggering an argument with a bystander who disputed the claim.
Similar protests erupted in Alexandria on Egypt's northern Mediterranean coast and Port Said, Ismailia and Suez, cities along the Suez Canal east of Cairo.
In Alexandria, some 2,000 protesters marched through the city, tearing up Shafiq and Mursi election posters they encountered along their way.
Abol Fotouh, Sabahy and Moussa filed complaints about the voting, all of which were rejected by the six judges forming the electoral committee.
The disputes add rancor to an already messy and often bloody transition to democracy since generals took over from Mubarak when a street revolt forced him out on February 11, 2011.
"I reject these results and do not recognize them," said Abol Fotouh, a former Brotherhood member, alleging that votes had been bought and representatives of candidates had been denied access to polling stations during the count.
Moussa said earlier that "question marks" hung over the vote. "There were violations, but this should not change our minds on democracy and the necessity of choosing our president."
The Muslim Brotherhood sought to muster a coalition to help Mursi against Shafiq, who calls Mubarak a role model.
The close contest has set both contenders scrambling for support, particularly the Muslim Brotherhood, which is trying to draw losing candidates and other political forces into a broad front to prevent a "counter-revolutionary" Shafiq victory.
The ultra-orthodox Salafi Islamist party Al-Nour has said it will now back Mursi, after siding with Abol Fotouh in the first round. The party has the second biggest bloc in parliament after the Brotherhood's Freedom and Justice Party.
Beyond the Islamist movement, it might prove harder for the group to find allies. Secular-minded parties have grown suspicious of the Brotherhood, accusing it of being power hungry and putting a quest for power over principle - charges it denies.
A Brotherhood source, who asked not to be named, said the Islamist group's FJP party had prepared a menu of options to tempt rival groups and politicians to its side.
These include creating a five-member advisory council to advise the president; assigning the posts of prime minister or vice-president to Abol Fotouh and Sabahy; distributing cabinet posts to other parties and offering compromises on planned laws and on an assembly tasked with drafting a new constitution.
Shafiq is also seeking wider backing, even posing as a protector of the revolt that toppled Mubarak.
Shafiq's supporters see him as the man to impose security and crack down on protests viewed as damaging to the economy.
Mursi appeals to Egyptians who believe the Islamists are best qualified to reform a corrupt state.
(c) Copyright Thomson Reuters 2012. Check for restrictions at: http://about.reuters.com/fulllegal.asp
tourettes gonzaga rosie o donnell soda bread recipe vanderbilt evan mathis staff sgt. robert bales
Have you ever thought that you are probably already doing content?marketing ?offline,? with talks and presentations at conferences or?business fairs? The concept of content marketing is nothing new, but?web 2.0 has created unlimited opportunities to publish and spread?content online with the help of the Internet and social media?networks. If you understand the similarities and differences between?content marketing ?on? and ?off?-line, your online marketing strategy?will become much (easier and) more effective.
Even though the stories and content in online and offline content?marketing often are the same, the methods and the format by which the?content is presented can differ quite strongly; the achieved results?will, accordingly, be diverse. Online content ? such as videos,?articles, comments, graphics ? has the chance of staying visible for a?much longer period of time than offline content. In fact, it can be?fairly difficult to remove content from online media once it has?gained a certain visibility. (This should be kept in mind when?publishing sensitive content.)
The goals in online and offline content marketing are closely?connected: build a reputation as an expert and connect to people who?can turn into business partners, collaborators and clients. With?online and offline content marketing, it is important to attract the?handful of people that fit with your business ideology, rather than?wasting time investing on an infinite amount of unrelated people. Let?this consideration be part of the decision in which type of content?you use. Rather create content that is helpful to your target audience?than ?fun? stuff that is spread, but does not inspire relevant people?to return to you for information.
Although speaking for a company throughout social media might induce a?desired amount of anonymity, you should be aware that personality?plays a big role in reputation. Even if the diction and facts in your?content are perfect, when personality is missing you risk someone else?get the job, as most of us would prefer to work with someone we feel?we ?know? and can trust. In offline content marketing, your?personality is usually part of the picture; you personally speak at a?conference and the best business meetings might have result from the?shared coffee after your talk. Within the anonymity of the Internet,?you have to make sure your personality transcends through the screen.?This might especially be a problem if your company expertise builds on?the expertise of multiple employees, or you choose to have social?media activity run by an external social media manager.